Bloc-Harper.com - Feedback section

LATEST CONTENT

One Canada or 10?

Funnies
section updated!

FEEDBACK

	What a scary thought for 60% of Canadian voters want to teach the Liberals a lesson so bad, that they are willing to bring in the Conservatives on a minority or majority and go down the road to deficit because of emotional reasons. Should a mandate be given to the Conservatives we would be going back to the dark Mulroney years of back to back deficits. -Today 60% of Canadian voters, have very short memory, or are completely in serious denial on the history of Canadian politics during the Brian Mulroney Progressive Conservative's long nine miserable years in office. -Steven Harper's thinking is a carbon copy of lying Mulroney's thinking, "promise the moon, and tax them to death, to pay for the moon", nothing but a hollow platform. -Harper campaigning on the last stretch notably saying "he intends to boost the defence spending enough for the world to take notice", what a troublesome stupid statement, spend money he doesn't have, so the world can take notice that he is banking on the weak emotional voter while investing big on the military is a useless exercise being we are neighbours with a Super Power and spending big on guns and bombs is neither necessary or prudent. -The Liberals, yes they have demonstrated obnoxious and sloppy ethical performance during their time in office, but the fact remains they have delivered eight consecutive successful budgets and the economy has been indisputably ten times better than the one we where suffering and inherited from the miserable Mulroney years. -On January 23 2006 should Canadians vote a majority Conservative Government, Canada will start on a new road to an out of control federal dept, and as we all know, history has a tendency in repeating it self.. -Bon Voyage to the 60% of the Canadian voters who choose to vote with emotion rather than clear understanding of the math involved between the Liberals and the Conservatives. Dear Canadian voter be very careful with what you wish for, history has often repeated it self, so vote with your brain and not your emotional nose. Thank You A concerned Canadian voter.
	I could not agree with you more. Stephen Harper will lead our country to ruin. As an immigrant and a visible minority, I fear for my continued life of peace in Canada. He is intolerant (my way or the high-way) with a one-track mind and cannot work in a team nor can he get consensus on legislature, therefore he wants to give all the powers to the provinces. This way he does not have to deal with getting agreement with all the Provinces. Harper's party is a true Reform Party/Canadian Alliance Party just painted over in Conservative blue. As far as foreign policy is concerned, Harper being the lap-dog of Bush will put all Canadians and particularly our Peace Keepers and soldiers abroad, in peril, especially in the Muslim countries. Why have the media (print,radio and TV) taken such a positive view on Harper? Are they that stupid that they cannot see beyond their noses?? Or are they just looking for some new "meat" to bash??? Perhaps because the Head Offices of the media giants are in Winnipeg and west of there? Mr. Martin is paying for the sins of another leader and also it is so sad to see the Chrétien loyalists, sabotage Mr. Martin and his campaign. Can some Martin faithful not flood the radio and TV and Newspaper and show how dangerous Harper will be for Canada's future?? We have but 4 days to go!!!!!!!! Thank you. Tony D'Costa
	Excuse me, but, if you wanted to convince the average joe guy and gal, I would suggest that you emphasize the last paragraph of the article Jan. 17th before all the rest of the stuff. I wasn’t clear to me…….but maybe I’m just plain stupid. I’m very opposed to Harper and his ideas. But to read your article, I found myself saying, well, would that be so bad. Finally in the last paragraph, I got a glimpse of YES and WHY it would be so bad. It seems to me that if media want to make a difference in how people think, then they have to make it smack of the point in the first few lines, they have to make it clear to all levels of education, they have to make it brief . Most people, I think can’t be bothered if it takes too much time and isn’t clear. To me, reasons WHY something need to convince me right off the bat. Since I want anybody but Harper, I hope that you can hurry up and make a strong case to Canadians why. Maybe you could entitle an article WHY NOT HARPER…here’s why not Sincerely, Joan
	Election Wishes Martin, Harper and Layton are flying on the Executive Airbus to a gathering in British Columbia when Martin turns to Harper and says, chuckling, "You know, I could throw a $1000 bill out the window right now and make someone very happy." Harper shrugs and replies, "Well, I could throw ten $100 billsout the window and make ten people happy." Not to be outdone, Layton says, "Well I could throw a hundred $10 bills out the window and make a hundred people happy." The pilot rolls his eyes and says to his co-pilot, "Such arrogant asses back there. Hell, I could throw all three of them out the window and make 32 million people happy."
	Please go here and view a better ad for liberals and feel free to share it all over the internet, blogs..etc. http://www.geocities.com/grasroot2004/turncoat.html thank you Buddy Kat
	Dear Editor: I was just wondering if those voters in Ontario have really thought it through. Stephen Harper may be a perfectly nice fellow; I have no way of knowing as I haven't really seen much of him in action. However, Stockwell Day is quite another matter. I wonder how many Ontarians would be happy with the former Alliance leader as Minister of Foreign Affairs (he is after all the Foreign Affaires critic); I'm sure George Bush and Pat Robertson would be thrilled (Pat and Stock could have a conversation about dinosaurs they've known). Perhaps we might even see Ralph Klein as the new Canadian Ambassador to the U.S. - say goodbye to public healthcare, as-well-as your gas, oil and water folks. I was born in Alberta, and have lived here most of my life. This is where the Alliance, now Conservative party, was born and a less caring, more nasty,sneering, whining bunch of Klein-clones you are unlikely to find anywhere ... unless of course you were unfortunate enough to find yourself magically transported into an Alberta Conservative Caucus meeting where only the truly spineless, most willing to check their brain at the door need apply. The only issue for me in this whole stupid exercise is the certain knowledge that if the Conservatives had been in power when George Bush started his phony war in Iraq, body bags of many Canadian service people would be a constant reminder of the stupidity of having elected and trusted a Conservative government made up largely of disaffected Alberta good ol' boys. Ian Patton ... a healthcare professional who got "Ralphed" in the great moronic Alberta healthcare blood-letting of 1996 - Stockwell supported that bit of slimy stupidity 100% by the way. Ian Patton Edmonton Alberta
	I agree whole-heartedly with your concern and have forwarded some of your articles to friends of mine. I have also created a quite anti-harper satirical web site at: http://www.boris-brothers.com, a sort of alias I use (I'm one of the Boris Brothers obviously). You might be interested, and thanks for your efforts. Let's hope the people wake up and see Harper for what he is. Cheers, Glen Hornblast
	In my view, it is Stephen Harper who is truly guilty of corruption. It is he who has spent at least the last two years trying to corrupt the minds of voters into believing that all Paul Martin Liberals are and have been involved in corrupt dealing yet when he is pressed, Harper is unable to name even one. While Harper accepted the perks and pay of Opposition Leader he spent his time bearing false witness against any Liberal, without even a shred of evidence, instead of working in Parliment to find solutions to Canada's real problems. While Harper has had a 'me too' helping hand from Jack Layton and Jack could be considered a corruptor as well, Harper is the main corruptor. Duceppe is a different breed. He says he is out to destroy Canada and is up front and centre as he goes about trying to get the job done. Before voting for Harper, I think a person should consider what Harper might have done when faced with the disgracefull sponsorship mess. Would Harper have been as upfront as Paul Martin was ?. Would Harper have implemented the new checks and balances which Martin did ? Would Harper implement the Gomery recomendations as Martin says Martin would ? How would Harper have treated Mulroney's friend Chuck Guite` ? If Harper wins this election, who will he select to replace Chuck Guite` ? Would he keep his fingers crossed that Chuck stays out of jail and then re-hire him ? We know who Paul Martin is and what he does in tough circumstances, but who is Stephen Harper - will the real one please stand up Thank you for the opportunity to vent. Doug Perry, Delta B C