|
LATEST CONTENT
One Canada or 10?
Funnies
section
updated!
Feedback section
updated!
Harper's "new" Confederation
The Demise of Canada
|
|
FEEDBACK

Your
comments are always welcome and appreciated. Please direct any
questions, concerns or general comments to the following email
address....
webmaster@bloc-harper.com
Since our website began in
May of 2005, we have received a number of emails from our readers who
share our views about the potential crisis Canada is facing.
 |
I was surprised to find this link from the Globe &
Mail. I agree with the objectives you "allege" Mr. Harper
harbours.
I think it is obvious to any thinking Canadian that the way
to save this great country is to evolve. To respect and
reflect the character of its regions.
If we continue to perpetuate the current system (which
affords a political party absolute power, if they are
sucessful in pandering to the population center of the
country) Canada will not survive.
Anyone who thinks the current political structure can
survive the withdrawal from Canada of Quebec is a fool.
Why not be proactive. Accommodate Quebec's aspirations
within Canada, and ensure the policies that satisfy those
aspirations are available to all Provinces and regions.
Thank God that Canada will be very different than what we
have today....a Canada based upon fairness and equality.
Craig Corser
|
 |
I just found Bloc-Harper.com. Congratulations!
I just wish every Canadian could read all the information
you have posted. I am heartsick at what the Harper/Flanagan
conservatives will do to our country, if given a chance. I
am also dismayed that so many Canadians are not willing to
think through their vote. Mention lower taxes and $1200 a
year to replace quality child care and many jump on the
conservative wagon. I guess all I can say is that people get
what they deserve. Sad, isn't it?
I just retired and the prospect of living in Italy is
becoming more appealing as we approach Jan. 23!
|
 |
Dear Mr. Sinclair,
your Bloc-Harper site is a surprisingly lonely voice of
clarity out there in the media landscape. I have been
utterly appalled at the poor quality of the mainstream
Canadian media during this election. They've been treating
the election like some kind of sporting event. The people of
Canada, including the majority of those who will vote
Conservative, simply have no idea what they're getting into
- what Harper really stands for, what he has always stood
for. And now even the Globe and Mail, under Marcus Gee's
neocon editorial direction, has taken to spinning everything
the Liberals do negatively and casting Harper as the
reasoned, responible statesman.
You're right that the 'new federalism' is really
sovereignty-association by another name, for all the
provinces. Moreover, Harper's plan will lead in short order
to the full-monty separation of Quebec from Canada. As soon
as the Parti Quebecois wins a provincial election in Quebec,
they've promised to hold another referendum. By that time,
the federal government will have become so utterly
irrelevant in Quebec that the 'soft federalists' who in the
past voted for staying in Canada (from their wallets, not
their hearts) will see no further reason to do so. Several
percent of soft-federalist votes will swing into the
Sovereignist camp, and Quebec will become an independent
nation.
Then the debate will begin over whether the anglo Provinces
should try to stay together as a rump Canada, or choose some
other alternative. In Alberta, they will be debating whether
to go it alone, join the USA, or stay in a rump
Confederation. If Alberta chooses any but the last of these
three options, Canada will break up entirely, with several
Provinces -- starting with the Maritimes -- most likely to
become U.S. states.
All this is happening because Harper spent two years
relentlessly slandering the Liberals and repeating the words
"Liberal" and "corrupt" in the same sentence so often that
it has become folk wisdom that "the Liberals are corrupt" --
whereas in reality, Paul Martin is Mr. Clean, a man bending
over backward to do the right thing and be seen to do the
right thing by being "forthright when problems occur" as
they did in relation to the tiny coterie of kickback-takers
associated with one Minister in the Chretien-era government.
There has been no serious discussion whatsoever, in the
national media, of the implications of this change in
government. No discussion of Harper's core agenda. It's
scandalous; the major media have failed Canada, and in my
view, this shows clearly that Canada is a managed
pseudo-democracy, not a real democracy. No country in
western Europe would have been left with such a weak debate;
the media do their jobs, there. Here, corporate
concentration of the media is so intense, and the editorial
rooms are so uniform, that the major news chains are really
'public opinion management agencies', not real tools of
democratic societal self-analysis.
I would like to ask you to do whatever you can, during the
next few days, to minimize the damage. Please get out there
and do some interviews, and call up your friends. Explain
Harper's plan for Canada and its implications, and encourage
people to vote Liberal. I think a few public statements from
one or more Mulroney-era Conservative ministers would give a
lot of voters pause as they are herded like sheep by the
national public opinion management chains into the
voting-booth on behalf of Harper's pseudo-Conservative
party.
Please call up every influential figure on your Rolodex and
get out there in public to urge people to vote Liberal,
explaining why, exactly as you do on your Bloc-Harper
website.
Thanks for doing what you can.
J. Zimmermann
Vancouver
more feedback >> |

|
|